As such, I was not going to post for so soon again on party internals, but reading the applications for the state meeting of the Vienna Open on Sunday drives me to do so. has been written about these applications take anything so far about the inability of the Vienna Open, with the Green Initiative deal primaries. And it is also clear why a large proportion of applications for the day has been moved beyond: For this state convention will decide whether the recent elections in supporters to be abolished by statute reform.
The motion tabled by the districts conference is "supporters have equal rights ... ... but no ... right to vote in section 10.2.6 a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q. "
intended to German so that the co-determination rights for all selectable functions are exposed, specifically as in the past for:
a = state committee
b = co-opted into the state committee
c = "Selection of members to control"
d = "Confirmation of co-optation of Control "
e = National Conference
f = delegates to the national conference
g = (replacement) delegate for the expanded national board
i = Executive Director
j = censure Executive Director
had for this internal party functions supporters have been no vote. Now, the following additional Features to come:
k = selection of candidates for Municipal Council elections
l = confirmation from the Town club proposed councilors n (for the case of a deviation from the selected list)
m = selection of Federal Councillors
= Removal of persons from the basic terms of reference list at the national election and Vienna Municipal and state elections
o = confirmation of the proposed by the National Conference Green councilors
p = selection list of the remaining votes for the parliamentary election
q = selection of the basic terms of reference list for the general election.
And that's was then, because there is more functions to choose it.
The literal wording of the voting rights and the previously applicable statutes can be found here: statutes Green Vienna
Another proposal, introduced "a majority of State Executive Committee" sets out to establish the right to vote of supporters at the district level (§ 5.7. third stress "), justified this by saying that "[Can] occur because of sudden very strong increase in Ansträge admission as a supporter [...] in some districts the situation that take well-organized groups significant impact on the district list design. As the district groups because of their relatively low membership and activists paid for such experiments in completely different ways are vulnerable as the national organization is to take the abuse of the statute in the field of prevention districts. "
I've written a few days now: A party that acts so will obviously remain small and to themselves. Voice is clearly accepted only as long as they do not change causes. If, however, by opening the slightest correction is necessary, it creates rather from the voice.
That the cadre officers, who bring such claims, have the chutzpah to accuse the supporters of an "abuse of status" is, in my view, already an incredible impudence. For if this runs someone abuse, then the current in the functions of any person, who - to their own "power" to secure - old principles of the Greens throw overboard to make the hatches and the party (or what is left) final of their (potential) voters foreclose.
The next Sunday is the acid test for the Green Party in Vienna. Should prevail in the squad, the whole initiative has become redundant Green primaries and the cadres can celebrate a victory. For it hardly anyone will be interested to support them then. Then they may remain safely in the future among themselves.
0 comments:
Post a Comment