Vienna doubled its promotion for the health and safety regulations in the form of the so-called scrapping premium for bicycles . Except that here with a SPÖ Vorfeldorganistion in contact potential new members is expected, the effect of the action to be limited. On the modal split in Vienna will do the same thing as have little effect on traffic safety. But the policy on cycling in the city of Vienna and has been above of rhetoric and weak action, such as the historical analysis the cycle network by Sándor Békési, curator in the Museum Wien shows.
...
Christoph Leitl wants a new Konjunturpaket for construction and business. After all, he has learned a little and wants 300 million euros for thermal remediation. A long to realize this requirement we have back in the early 90s at Global 2000 collected and counted by that time already, what economic benefits it would bring. But it will probably stay with the demand for economy minister Mitterlehner has rejected this reflexive as voodoo economics . Here, human touch probably, but could the former number two of the eternal Commerce show the former head at last, where the Bartl the must obtained. Innovative approaches, however, can miss both.
...
The first two economic stimulus packages, has indeed put Austria in the international comparison "a comprehensive economic stimulus" (WIFO). Wifo has now submitted a analysis of what was accomplished with it. With expenditure of 3.5% of nominal GDP in 2008 was the sharp drop in GDP for 2009 and 2010, according to Wifo be attenuated by 2.1%. Or, in terms of jobs: 41,000 jobs were retained, the increase in the unemployment rate would be attenuated to 0.7%. Translated, this means (that is now but a naive statement) that each of these jobs with just under 240,000, - € was based. Apart from the fact that I can think of more effective support measures, the question of sustainability. The share of so-called future investments in these packages was only 30% (again keyword scrapping premiums), explained Wifo expert Margaret Schratzenstaller-Altzinger in Alpbach and at the same event said the former EU Commissioner Franz Fischler, that "the willingness to learn substantially from the current crisis, barely pronounced." I have this analysis is currently doing nothing to add.
...
Andreas Unterberger is a journalist in principle be as crude far-right opinions, that it actually can be safely on the left. But on his diary this week, specifically Tuesday, he takes with his single-parent-phobia is a view that is obviously ÖVP-keeping and in the government majority. Therefore, I drag him but for a change from his defiance angle: He writes of the dangerous Single mothers (ER says sure all women) would have to say only their partner would be dangerous and even - Nero Ahead - could completely relate unjustified as long child benefits as married couples. Unfortunately
thinks the entire People's Party (Marek, disenchanted) and the Social Democratic Party has put in anything contrary to truth.
the wayside once again not only the "dangerous" single parents (up to 100 percent Egoistinnen malicious, intent only on their advantage) but also their children. Because the - the only logical - approach that "child benefits" in the same amount for each child (and not per head of the parents) should be measured, appears in this to get strange country hardly anyone .
Even the Greens do not argue the point. Daniel Musiol requires that "single parents are those months that normally accrue to the partner paid." Thus, here is the picture as if the single parents demand something they do not really deserve. So you will not get at the VP.
It is so simple: the money belongs to the children. Every individual is equal to much. The parents (whether single parents or couples) are only the managers inside the center. Is that so hard to understand?
0 comments:
Post a Comment